Skip to Main Content
   
the NC AHEC logo    
     

Mammography Symposium 2025

September 17, 2025

Conference Brochure

Conference Brochure

                                                                       

Enhancing Collaborative Care: Optimizing Imaging and Surgical Outcomes in Breast Cancer Management

Here's a summary of how to enhance collaborative care and optimize imaging and surgical outcomes in breast cancer management:

I. The Pillars of Collaborative Care:

  • Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards (MDTBs):

    • Regular meetings involving radiologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, genetic counselors, and nurse navigators.

    • Develop individualized treatment plans through integrated perspectives.

  • Standardized Communication Pathways:

    • Clear and consistent channels for reporting (e.g., imaging reports, surgical notes).

    • Readily accessible patient information systems for all team members.

  • Integrated Patient Navigation:

    • Dedicated navigators to guide patients through diagnosis and treatment.

    • Ensure timely appointments and facilitate communication between specialists.

  • Shared Decision-Making:

    • Empower patients with clear explanations of options and outcomes.

    • Foster trust and improve treatment adherence.

  • Continuous Quality Improvement:

    • Regular review of outcomes and analysis of discrepancies.

    • Implement feedback loops for process enhancement.

II. Optimizing Imaging Outcomes:

  • State-of-the-Art Imaging Technologies:

    • 3D Mammography (DBT): Superior for cancer detection and reducing recalls, especially in dense breasts.

    • Breast MRI: Essential for high-risk screening, disease extent evaluation, neoadjuvant therapy response, and surgical planning.

    • Ultrasound: Characterizes masses, guides biopsies, and evaluates axillary nodes.

    • Molecular Imaging (e.g., PET/CT): For staging, treatment response, and recurrence detection.

  • Standardized Imaging Protocols:

    • Adherence to established guidelines (e.g., ACR appropriateness criteria) for consistency.

  • Radiologist Expertise and Subspecialization:

    • Specialized breast imaging radiologists for accurate interpretation and timely reporting.

    • Continuous education and training.

  • Pre-Surgical Localization Techniques:

    • Wire Localization: Traditional method for non-palpable lesions.

    • Radioactive Seed Localization (RSL)/Magnetic Seed Localization (Magseed): Improved comfort, flexibility, precision, and reduced positive margins.

    • Intraoperative Ultrasound: For direct visualization and guidance during excision; confirms tumor removal.

  • Image-Guided Biopsy:

    • Stereotactic, ultrasound-guided, and MRI-guided biopsies for definitive diagnosis, reducing open surgical biopsies.

III. Optimizing Surgical Outcomes:

  • Pre-Surgical Planning Driven by Imaging:

    • Detailed imaging reports and MDTB discussions inform surgical approach (lumpectomy vs. mastectomy), lymph node management, and reconstruction.

  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB):

    • Reduces morbidity of axillary dissection while providing accurate staging.

    • Utilizes dual tracer mapping (radioactive colloid/blue dye) or ICG fluorescence.

  • Oncoplastic Breast Surgery:

    • Combines oncological principles with plastic surgery for optimal cosmetic results after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy.

  • Intraoperative Margin Assessment:

    • Pathology Frozen Sections: Rapid assessment to ensure complete tumor removal and reduce re-excisions.

    • Cavity Shave Margins: Excision of additional tissue to reduce positive margin risk.

    • Intraoperative Specimen Radiography: Confirms lesion presence and assesses margin relationship.

    • Emerging Technologies (e.g., OCT, Mass Spectrometry): Research for real-time margin assessment.

  • Minimally Invasive Techniques:

    • Advancements in nipple-sparing mastectomy and techniques for improved cosmesis.

  • Post-Surgical Care and Rehabilitation:

    • Comprehensive care including pain management, wound care, and physical therapy (lymphedema prevention).

IV. Bridging the Gap: The Role of Technology and Education:

  • Integrated PACS and EMR Systems:

    • Seamless access to comprehensive patient data for all care team members.

  • Telemedicine and Virtual Consultations:

    • Enhance collaboration, especially for remote patients or specialist consultations.

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML):

    • Emerging applications for improved detection, diagnosis, risk stratification in imaging.

    • Potential for surgical planning and real-time guidance.

  • Cross-Disciplinary Education and Training:

    • Workshops, grand rounds, and joint conferences for deeper understanding among specialists.

  • Simulation and Virtual Reality (VR):

    • For surgical training and practicing complex interventional procedures.

V. Challenges and Future Directions:

  • Interoperability of IT Systems: Ensuring seamless data exchange.

  • Reimbursement Models: Supporting multidisciplinary approaches and advanced technologies.

  • Managing Data Overload: Effectively utilizing vast amounts of data.

  • Addressing Health Disparities: Ensuring equitable access to care.

  • Future Focus: Further integration of genomics and proteomics, refinement of imaging/surgical techniques, and personalized medicine.

Source: Google Gemini

Multidisciplinary collaboration, advanced imaging, and optimized surgical approaches in mammography

Multidisciplinary collaboration, advanced imaging, and optimized surgical approaches are crucial for enhancing breast cancer management and improving patient outcomes.

Enhancing Collaborative Care: Optimizing Imaging and Surgical Outcomes in Breast Cancer Management

Optimizing breast cancer management involves a multifaceted approach that integrates imaging diagnostics with surgical strategies, all underpinned by collaborative care models. Key aspects include:

URL Links for Mammography Professionals

For mammography professionals, various organizations and resources provide essential information, guidelines, and educational opportunities:

Research from PubMed

Items 1-10 of 10 (Display the 10 citations in PubMed)

1.

Hispanic Ethnicity and Breast Cancer: Disaggregating Surgical Management and Mortality by Race.

Hamad A, Li Y, Tsung A, Oppong B, Eskander MF, Bhattacharyya O, Obeng-Gyasi S.

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Aug;9(4):1568-1576. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01096-3. Epub 2021 Jul 12.

PMID: 34254268 Free PMC article.

2.

Robotic Versus Conventional or Endoscopic-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction in the Management of Breast Cancer: A Prospectively Designed Multicenter Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes, Medical Cost, and Patient-reported Outcomes (RCENSM-P).

Lai HW, Chen DR, Liu LC, Chen ST, Kuo YL, Lin SL, Wu YC, Huang TC, Hung CS, Lin YJ, Tseng HS, Mok CW, Cheng FT.

Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):138-146. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005924. Epub 2023 May 25.

PMID: 37226826 Free PMC article.

3.

One versus three weeks hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer treatment: the FAST-Forward phase III RCT.

Brunt AM, Haviland JS, Wheatley DA, Sydenham MA, Bloomfield DJ, Chan C, Cleator S, Coles CE, Donovan E, Fleming H, Glynn D, Goodman A, Griffin S, Hopwood P, Kirby AM, Kirwan CC, Nabi Z, Patel J, Sawyer E, Somaiah N, Syndikus I, Venables K, Yarnold JR, Bliss JM; FAST-Forward Trial Management Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2023 Nov;27(25):1-176. doi: 10.3310/WWBF1044.

PMID: 37991196 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

4.

Safety of fertility preservation techniques before and after anticancer treatments in young women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arecco L, Blondeaux E, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Latocca MM, Marrocco C, Boutros A, Spagnolo F, Razeti MG, Favero D, Spinaci S, Condorelli M, Massarotti C, Goldrat O, Del Mastro L, Demeestere I, Lambertini M.

Hum Reprod. 2022 May 3;37(5):954-968. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac035.

PMID: 35220429 Free PMC article.

5.

Surgical Management of Textured Breast Implants: Assessing Risk and Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Plotsker EL, Stern CS, Graziano FD, Rubenstein RN, Vingan PS, Haglich K, Monge J, Disa JJ, Mehrara BJ, Dayan JH, Allen R Jr, Matros E, McCarthy C, Nelson JA.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jul 1;154(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010957. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

PMID: 37535711 Free PMC article.

6.

Impact of Breast Cancer Pretreatment Nodal Burden and Disease Subtype on Axillary Surgical Management.

Ng S, Sabel MS, Hughes TM, Chang AE, Dossett LA, Jeruss JS.

J Surg Res. 2021 May;261:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.007. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

PMID: 33421795 Free PMC article.

7.

Quality indicators for the diagnosis and surgical management of breast cancer in South Africa.

Nietz S, Ruff P, Chen WC, O'Neil DS, Norris SA.

Breast. 2020 Dec;54:187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

PMID: 33120084 Free PMC article. Review.

8.

Locoregional Management of Breast Cancer: A Chronological Review.

Al-Rashdan A, Deban M, Quan ML, Cao JQ.

Curr Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;29(7):4647-4664. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29070369.

PMID: 35877229 Free PMC article. Review.

9.

Surgical Management of the Breast and Axilla after Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Hershko D.

Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021 Mar-Apr;116(2):143-149. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.116.2.143.

PMID: 33950809

10.

Gestational breast cancer in New South Wales: A population-based linkage study of incidence, management, and outcomes.

Safi N, Saunders C, Hayen A, Anazodo A, Lui K, Li Z, Remond M, Nicholl M, Wang AY, Sullivan E.

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245493. eCollection 2021.

PMID: 33481842 Free PMC article.